Review



biotinylated recombinant human ace2  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 91

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems biotinylated recombinant human ace2
    Biotinylated Recombinant Human Ace2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated recombinant human ace2/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    biotinylated recombinant human ace2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    91/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Sino Biological recombinant human ace2 protein
    Recombinant Human Ace2 Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human ace2 protein/product/Sino Biological
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human ace2 protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    R&D Systems biotinylated recombinant human ace2
    Biotinylated Recombinant Human Ace2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated recombinant human ace2/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated recombinant human ace2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems recombinant human ace2
    Recombinant Human Ace2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human ace2/product/R&D Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human ace2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Cusabio recombinant human angiotensin
    Recombinant Human Angiotensin, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human angiotensin/product/Cusabio
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human angiotensin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    R&D Systems human ace2
    Human Ace2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human ace2/product/R&D Systems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human ace2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    ACROBiosystems recombinant hace 2
    Recombinant Hace 2, supplied by ACROBiosystems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant hace 2/product/ACROBiosystems
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant hace 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Creative BioMart binding between ace2
    Comparing the immunogenicity of Sp and aSp in immunocompetent mice, as assessed using different adjuvants (A) ELISA assessment of IgG titers over 18 weeks total post-immunization. The dotted red line represents the time point at which a recall vaccination (third dosing) was conducted in the absence of adjuvant. (B) ELISA assessment of IgG binding to the S1 versus S2 domain of the Sp protein. The sera analyzed in this experiment were derived from samples collected at week 3. (C) ELISA assessment of the different isotypes contained in the sera derived from animals receiving the Sp or aSp vaccine. The samples analyzed were those collected at week 3. (D) Luminex analysis conducted on in vitro re-stimulated splenocytes immunized using the same schema depicted in panel A. Red triangles refer to cytokines/chemokines with depicted differences. (E) A representative schema of the in vitro infectivity assay conducted on HEK cells using Sp-pseudotyped viral particles in the presence of neutralizing antibodies derived from the experiment shown in panel B. (F) The NT 50 results of the infectivity assay conducted in the presence of the neutralizing antibodies. (G) Representative SPR sensorgram in which capture of pre-immune sera (1/100 dilution as negative control) failed to block <t>ACE2</t> binding to Sp-immobilized sensors. (H) SPR in which 1/100 or 1/1000 dilutions of week 3 neutralizing antibody (nAb)-containing sera #5 inhibited ACE2-Sp binding; the effect was lost when the nAb sera was diluted 1/3000. For experiments in panels A-F: n = 5–6 per group. Data are represented as mean ± SD with ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Also see .
    Binding Between Ace2, supplied by Creative BioMart, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/binding between ace2/product/Creative BioMart
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    binding between ace2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Creative BioMart ace2 736h
    Comparing the immunogenicity of Sp and aSp in immunocompetent mice, as assessed using different adjuvants (A) ELISA assessment of IgG titers over 18 weeks total post-immunization. The dotted red line represents the time point at which a recall vaccination (third dosing) was conducted in the absence of adjuvant. (B) ELISA assessment of IgG binding to the S1 versus S2 domain of the Sp protein. The sera analyzed in this experiment were derived from samples collected at week 3. (C) ELISA assessment of the different isotypes contained in the sera derived from animals receiving the Sp or aSp vaccine. The samples analyzed were those collected at week 3. (D) Luminex analysis conducted on in vitro re-stimulated splenocytes immunized using the same schema depicted in panel A. Red triangles refer to cytokines/chemokines with depicted differences. (E) A representative schema of the in vitro infectivity assay conducted on HEK cells using Sp-pseudotyped viral particles in the presence of neutralizing antibodies derived from the experiment shown in panel B. (F) The NT 50 results of the infectivity assay conducted in the presence of the neutralizing antibodies. (G) Representative SPR sensorgram in which capture of pre-immune sera (1/100 dilution as negative control) failed to block <t>ACE2</t> binding to Sp-immobilized sensors. (H) SPR in which 1/100 or 1/1000 dilutions of week 3 neutralizing antibody (nAb)-containing sera #5 inhibited ACE2-Sp binding; the effect was lost when the nAb sera was diluted 1/3000. For experiments in panels A-F: n = 5–6 per group. Data are represented as mean ± SD with ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Also see .
    Ace2 736h, supplied by Creative BioMart, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ace2 736h/product/Creative BioMart
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ace2 736h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparing the immunogenicity of Sp and aSp in immunocompetent mice, as assessed using different adjuvants (A) ELISA assessment of IgG titers over 18 weeks total post-immunization. The dotted red line represents the time point at which a recall vaccination (third dosing) was conducted in the absence of adjuvant. (B) ELISA assessment of IgG binding to the S1 versus S2 domain of the Sp protein. The sera analyzed in this experiment were derived from samples collected at week 3. (C) ELISA assessment of the different isotypes contained in the sera derived from animals receiving the Sp or aSp vaccine. The samples analyzed were those collected at week 3. (D) Luminex analysis conducted on in vitro re-stimulated splenocytes immunized using the same schema depicted in panel A. Red triangles refer to cytokines/chemokines with depicted differences. (E) A representative schema of the in vitro infectivity assay conducted on HEK cells using Sp-pseudotyped viral particles in the presence of neutralizing antibodies derived from the experiment shown in panel B. (F) The NT 50 results of the infectivity assay conducted in the presence of the neutralizing antibodies. (G) Representative SPR sensorgram in which capture of pre-immune sera (1/100 dilution as negative control) failed to block ACE2 binding to Sp-immobilized sensors. (H) SPR in which 1/100 or 1/1000 dilutions of week 3 neutralizing antibody (nAb)-containing sera #5 inhibited ACE2-Sp binding; the effect was lost when the nAb sera was diluted 1/3000. For experiments in panels A-F: n = 5–6 per group. Data are represented as mean ± SD with ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Also see .

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: A Spike-Accum bioconjugate protein vaccine confers potent SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113314

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparing the immunogenicity of Sp and aSp in immunocompetent mice, as assessed using different adjuvants (A) ELISA assessment of IgG titers over 18 weeks total post-immunization. The dotted red line represents the time point at which a recall vaccination (third dosing) was conducted in the absence of adjuvant. (B) ELISA assessment of IgG binding to the S1 versus S2 domain of the Sp protein. The sera analyzed in this experiment were derived from samples collected at week 3. (C) ELISA assessment of the different isotypes contained in the sera derived from animals receiving the Sp or aSp vaccine. The samples analyzed were those collected at week 3. (D) Luminex analysis conducted on in vitro re-stimulated splenocytes immunized using the same schema depicted in panel A. Red triangles refer to cytokines/chemokines with depicted differences. (E) A representative schema of the in vitro infectivity assay conducted on HEK cells using Sp-pseudotyped viral particles in the presence of neutralizing antibodies derived from the experiment shown in panel B. (F) The NT 50 results of the infectivity assay conducted in the presence of the neutralizing antibodies. (G) Representative SPR sensorgram in which capture of pre-immune sera (1/100 dilution as negative control) failed to block ACE2 binding to Sp-immobilized sensors. (H) SPR in which 1/100 or 1/1000 dilutions of week 3 neutralizing antibody (nAb)-containing sera #5 inhibited ACE2-Sp binding; the effect was lost when the nAb sera was diluted 1/3000. For experiments in panels A-F: n = 5–6 per group. Data are represented as mean ± SD with ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Also see .

    Article Snippet: Binding between ACE2 (recombinant human ACE2, ∼105 kDa; Creative Biomart #ACE2-736H) and the Spike protein (Sp; SARS-CoV-2 S protein (D614G) super stable trimer, ∼185 kDa; Acro Biosystems #SPN-C52H3) was monitored using a BIACORE 3000 system (Cytiva Life Sciences).

    Techniques: Immunopeptidomics, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Adjuvant, Binding Assay, Derivative Assay, Luminex, In Vitro, Infection, Negative Control, Blocking Assay